2023年9月14日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案（劍橋雅思8的test2閱讀答案）

最近經(jīng)常有小伙伴私信詢問2023年9月14日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案（劍橋雅思8的test2閱讀答案）相關(guān)的問題，今天，大學路小編整理了以下內(nèi)容，希望可以對大家有所幫助。

本文目錄一覽：

• 1、2023年9月14日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案
• 2、劍橋雅思8的test2閱讀答案
• 3、請問2023年8月1日雅思閱讀考試真題答案

2023年9月14日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案

您好，我是專注留學考試規(guī)劃和留學咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學夢想的路上，選擇合適的學校和專業(yè)，準備相關(guān)考試，都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經(jīng)驗的留學顧問，我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導。歡迎隨時提問！
雅思的標準化考試成績，是大家遞交留學申請必須要出示的成績，那么最新一期的考試情況怎么樣呢？和小鐘老師看看2023年9月14日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案。
一、考題解析
P1 新聞消息是如何傳播的
P2 柵欄
P3 美國工作壓力
二、名師點評
1. 本次考試難度偏低。
2. 整體分析：涉及三篇人文社科類文章
本場考試可能讓很多小伙伴對我們的閱讀放心了心，畢竟相比我們12號那場考試，整體難度降了下來，但是，倒是雅思聽力上了熱搜榜。讓很多小朋友叫苦不迭。這三篇閱讀總體來說難度低的很善良，有一篇還是之前考過的原題。題型也是大家熟悉的幾大題型搭配?？傊褪侵灰阌眯臏蕚洌谇耙粋€階段把該刷的題目都刷了，該背的詞匯都背了，基本是沒有什么問題的。
3.主要題型：涉及判斷題、填空題、配對題、heading、選擇等。
4.文章分析：
第一篇文章主要講關(guān)于信息傳遞的內(nèi)容；
第二篇文章講述柵欄的作用有關(guān)內(nèi)容；
第三篇介紹關(guān)于就業(yè)的相關(guān)內(nèi)容
5.部分答案及參考文章：
Passage 1：
題材：人文社科類
題目：新聞消息是如何傳播的
文章難度：三顆星
文章：待補充
參考答案：
1. letters
2. legal
3. religious
4. distribution
5. songs
6. journalists
7. advertising
8. FALSE
9. TRUE
10. NOT GIVEN
11. TRUE
12. FALSE
13. FALSE
可以參考劍橋雅思真題：C9 T3 P3 （Information Theory—The Big Idea）
Passage 2：
題材：人文社科類
題目：柵欄
文章難度：三顆星
文章：待補充
題型：heading 7題+填空題 4題+選擇 2題
可以參考劍橋雅思真題：C12 T8 P1 （The History of Glass）
Passage 3：
題材：人文社科
題目：美國工作壓力
文章難度：三顆星
參考答案和文章待補充
可以參考劍橋雅思真題：C8 T3 P3 （HOW DOES THE BIOLOGICAL CLOCK TICK）
三、考試預(yù)測
1. 2023年9月的考試基本已經(jīng)接近了尾聲，通過這幾場的考試來看，目前題目的整體難度一直是趨向于穩(wěn)定，沒有出現(xiàn)大段大段配對題的情況，所以總體來說對大家是非常友善的。對于我們目前等待參加下一場考試的同學可以好好反思一下，自己的基礎(chǔ)題型是否熟練呢？基礎(chǔ)搭配是否有掌握好呢？在9月最后的這一場考試當中，我們除了要著重關(guān)注：判斷題+填空 段落細節(jié)搭配題+配對/填空題這幾種常見的題型搭配之外。還要謹防在在最后一場考試當中可能會突然增加配對題的個數(shù)，所以在上考場前小伙伴可以再把配對題的幾個題型熟悉一下哦~。
2. 下場考試的話題可能有關(guān)生物類，心理類，社會類題材文章
3. 重點瀏覽2023年機經(jīng)。

希望以上的答復能對您的留學申請有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細的問題或需要進一步的協(xié)助，我強烈推薦您訪問我們的留學官方網(wǎng)站 ，在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學考試規(guī)劃和留學資料以及*的咨詢服務(wù)。祝您留學申請順利！

劍橋雅思8的test2閱讀答案

Test 2
Listening 部分
1 Milperra
2 First Class Movers
3 28 November
4 screen
5 bathroom
6 door
7 140
8 leg
9 plates
10 60
11 B
12 (the) Forest
13 Fish Fam(s)
14 Market Garden
15 C 16A 17C 18B 19C 20A 21A 22B 23C 24 A
25 insepects
26 feeding/eating
27 laboratory
28 water
29 wings
30 reilable/accurate
31B 32B 33A 34A 35C 36C 37B 38F 39D 40C

Reading 部分
1 spinning 2(perfectly) unblemished 3 labour/labor-intensive 4 thickness 5marked 6(molten) glass 7(moiten) tin/metal 8rollers
9TRUE
10NOT GIVEN
11 FALSE
12TRUE
13 TRUE
14 II
15 VII
16 IX
17 IV
18&19 BC
20 A
21 H
22 G
23 C
24 C
25A
26B
27 VIII
28 II
29 VI
30 I
31 III
32V
33 C
34 A
35 C
36 D
37 clothing
38 vocabulary
39 chemicals
40 cultures

全部手打 要PDF全本或者MP3請hi我

請問2023年8月1日雅思閱讀考試真題答案

您好，我是專注留學考試規(guī)劃和留學咨詢的小鐘老師。選擇留學是人生重要的決策之一，而作為您的指導，我非常高興能為您提供最準確的留學解答和規(guī)劃。無論您的問題是關(guān)于考試準備、專業(yè)選擇、申請流程還是學校信息，我都在這里為您解答。更多留學資訊和學校招生介紹，歡迎隨時訪問。
8月1號進行了八月初的第一場雅思的考試，相信大家對真題以及答案會非常的感興趣、今天就由小鐘老師為大家介紹2023年8月1日雅思閱讀考試真題答案。
一、考題解析
P1 土地沙漠化
P2 澳大利亞的鸚鵡
P3 多重任務(wù)
二、名師點評
1.8月份首場考試的難度總體中等，有出現(xiàn)比較多的配對題，沒有出現(xiàn)Heading題，其余主要以常規(guī)的填空，判斷和選擇題為主。文章的話題和題型搭配也是在劍橋真題中都有跡可循，所以備考重心依然還是劍橋官方真題。
2. 整體分析：涉及環(huán)境類（P1）、動物類（P2）、社科類（P3）。
本次考試的P2和P3均為舊題。P2是動物類的話題，題型組合為：段落細節(jié)配對+單選+summary填空，難度中等。題型上也延續(xù)19年的出題特點，出現(xiàn)配對題，考察定位速度和準確度。P3也出現(xiàn)了段落細節(jié)配對，主要是段落細節(jié)配對+單選+判斷。三種題型難度中等，但是文章理解起來略有難度。
3. 部分答案及參考文章：
Passage 1：土地沙漠化
題型及答案待確認
Passage 2：澳大利亞的鸚鵡
題型：段落細節(jié)配對+單選+Summary填空
技巧分析：由于段落細節(jié)配對是完全亂序出題，在定位時需要先做后面的單選題及填空題，最大化利用已讀信息來確定答案，盡量避免重復閱讀，以保證充分的做題時間。
文章內(nèi)容及題目參考：
A 概況，關(guān)于一個大的生物種類
B 一些物種消失的原因，題干關(guān)鍵詞：an example of one bird species extinct
C 一種鸚鵡不能自己存活，以捕食另一種鳥為生，吃該鳥類的蛋。題干關(guān)鍵詞：two species competed at the expense of oneanother
D 吸引鸚鵡的原因以及鸚鵡嘴的特點。題干關(guān)鍵詞：*ysis of reasons as Australian landscapeattract parrots
E 植物是如何適應(yīng)鸚鵡。題干關(guān)鍵詞：plants attract birds which make the animal adaptto the environment
F 南半球?qū)τ⒄Z的影響
G 兩種鸚鵡從環(huán)境改變中獲益并存活下來。題干關(guān)鍵詞：two species of parrots benefit fromm theenvironment change
H 外來物種及本地鸚鵡
I 鳥類棲息地被破壞以及人類采取的措施
J 作者對于鸚鵡問題的態(tài)度
單選題：
why parrots in the whole world are lineal descendants of
選項關(guān)鍵詞：continent split from Africa
the writer thinks parrots species beak is for
選項關(guān)鍵詞：adjust to their suitable diet
which one is not mentioned
選項關(guān)鍵詞：should be frequently maintained
填空題：分布在文章的前兩段
one-sixth
16th century
mapmaker
John Gould
Passage 3：多重任務(wù)
題型：段落細節(jié)配對+單選+判斷
參考答案及文章
28 F
29I
30C
31B
32G
33C
34B
35A
36YES
37YES
38NO
39NOT GIVEN
40NO
Passage3： multitasking
Multitasking Debate—Can you do them at the same time？
Talking on the phone while driving isn＇t the only situationwhere we＇re worse at multitasking than we might like to think we are. Newstudies have identified a bottleneck in our brains that some say means we arefundamentally incapable of true multitasking. If experimental findings reflectreal-world performance， people who think they are multitasking are probablyjust underperforming in all-or at best， all but one -of their parallelpursuits. Practice might improve your performance， but you will never be asgood as when focusing on one task at a time.
The problem， according to René Marois， a psychologist atVanderbilt University in Nashville， Tennessee， is that there＇s a sticking pointin the brain. To demonstrate this， Marois devised an experiment to locate nteers watch a screen and when a particular image appears， a red circle，say， they have to press a key with their index finger. Different colouredcircles require presses from different fingers. Typical response time is about half a second， and thevolunteers quickly reach their peak performance. Then they learn to listen todifferent recordings and respond by making a specific sound. For instance， whenthey hear a bird chirp， they have to say ＂ba＂； an electronic soundshould elicit a ＂ko＂， and so on. Again， no problem. A normal personcan do that in about half a second， with almost no effort. The trouble comeswhen Marois shows the volunteers an image， then almost immediately plays them asound. Now they＇re flummoxed. ＂If you show an image and play a sound atthe same time， one task is postponed，＂ he says. In fact，if the second taskis introduced within the half-second or so it takes to process and react to thefirst， it will simply be delayed until the first one is done. The largestdual-task delays occur when the two tasks are presented simultaneously； delaysprogressively shorten as the interval between presenting the tasks lengthens（See Diagram）.
There are at least three points where we seem to getstuck， says Marois. The first is in simply identifying what we＇re looking can take a few tenths of a second， during which time we are not able tosee and recognise a second item. This limitation is known as the＂attentional blink＂： experiments have shown that if you＇re watchingout for a particular event and a second one shows up unexpectedly any timewithin this crucial window of concentration， it may register in your visualcortex but you will be unable to act upon it. Interestingly， if you don＇texpect the first event， you have no trouble responding to the second. Whatexactly causes the attentional blink is still a matter for debate.
A second limitation is in our short-term visual ＇s estimated that we can keep track of about four items at a time， fewer ifthey are complex. This capacity shortage is thought to explain， in part， our astonishinginability to detect even huge changes in scenes that are otherwise identical，so-called ＂change blindness＂. Show people pairs of near-identicalphotos -say， aircraft engines in one picture have disappeared in the other -andthey will fail to spot the differences （if you don＇t believe it， check out theclips at /~rensink/flicker/download）. Here again， though， thereis disagreement about what the essential limiting factor really is. Does itcome down to a dearth of storage capacity， or is it about how much attention aviewer is paying？
A third limitation is that choosing a response to astimulus -braking when you see a child in the road， for instance，or replyingwhen your mother tells you over the phone that she＇s thinking of leaving yourdad -also takes brainpower. Selecting a response to one of these things willdelay by some tenths of a second your ability to respond to the other. This iscalled the ＂response selection bottleneck＂ theory， first proposed in1952.
Last December， Marois and his colleagues published apaper arguing that this bottleneck is in fact created in two different areas ofthe brain： one in the posterior lateral prefrontal cortex and another in thesuperior medial frontal cortex （Neuron， vol 52， p 1109）. They found this byscanning people＇s brains with functional MRI while the subjects struggled tochoose among eight possible responses to each of two closely timed tasks. Theydiscovered that these brain areas are not tied to any particular sense but aregenerally involved in selecting responses， and they seemed to queue theseresponses when presented with multiple tasks concurrently.
Bottleneck？ What bottleneck？
But David Meyer， a psychologist at the University ofMichigan， Ann Arbor， doesn＇t buy the bottleneck idea. He thinks dual-taskinterference is just evidence of a strategy used by the brain to prioritisemultiple activities. Meyer is known as something of an optimist by his has written papers with titles like ＂Virtually perfect time-sharing indual-task performance： Uncorking the central cognitive bottleneck＂（Psychological Science， vol 12， p101）. His experiments have shown that withenough practice -at least 2000 tries -some people can execute two taskssimultaneously as competently as if they were doing them one after the suggests that there is a central cognitive processor that coordinates allthis and， what＇s more， he thinks it uses discretion： sometimes it chooses todelay one task while completing another.
Even with practice， not all people manage to achieve thisharmonious time-share， however. Meyer argues that individual differences comedown to variations in the character of the processor -some brains are just more＂cautious＂， some more ＂daring＂. And despite urban legend，there are no noticeable
differences between men and women. So， according to him，it＇s not a central bottleneck that causes dual-task interference， but rather＂adaptive executive control＂， which ＂schedules task processesappropriately to obey instructions about their relative priorities and serialorder＂.
Marois agrees that practice can sometimes eraseinterference effects. He has found that with just 1 hour of practice each dayfor two weeks， volunteers show a huge improvement at managing both his tasks atonce. Where he disagrees with Meyer is in what the brain is doing to achievethis. Marois speculates that practice might give us the chance to find lesscongested circuits to execute a task -rather like finding trusty back streetsto avoid heavy traffic on main roads -effectively making our response to thetask subconscious. After all， there are plenty of examples of subconsciou*ultitasking that most of us routinely manage： walking and talking， eating andreading， watching TV and folding the laundry.
But while some dual tasks benefit from practice， otherssimply do not. ＂Certain kinds of tasks are really hard to do two atonce，＂ says Pierre Jolicoeur at the University of Montreal， Canada， whoalso studies multitasking. Dual tasks involving a visual stimulus andskeletal-motor response （which he dubs ＂in the eye and out the hand＂）and an auditory stimulus with a verbal response （＂in the ear and out themouth＂） do seem to be amenable to practice， he says. Jolicoeur has foundthat with enough training such tasks can be performed as well together asapart. He speculates that the brain connections that they use may be somehowspecial， because we learn to speak by hearing and learn to move by looking. Butpair visual input with a verbal response， or sound to motor， and there＇s nodramatic improvement. ＂It looks like no amount of practice will allow youto combine these，＂ he says.
For research purposes， these experiments have to be keptsimple. Real-world multitasking poses much greater challenges. Even the upbeatMeyer is sceptical about how a lot of us live our lives. Instant-messaging andtrying to do your homework？ ＂It can＇t be done，＂ he says. Conducting ajob interview while answering emails？ ＂There＇s no way you wind up being asgood.＂ Needless to say， there appear to be no researchers in the area ofmultitasking who believe that you can safely drive a car and carry on a phoneconversation. In fact， last year David Strayer at the University of Utah inSalt Lake City reported that people using cellphones drive no better thandrunks （Human Factors， vol 48， p 381）. In another study， Strayer found thatusing a hands-free kit did not improve a driver＇s response time. He concludedthat what distracts a driver so badly is the very act of talking to someone whoisn＇t present in the car and therefore is unaware of the hazards facing thedriver.
“No researchers believe it＇s safe to drive a car andcarry on a phone conversation”
It probably comes as no surprise that， generallyspeaking， we get worse at multitasking as we age. According to Art Kramer atthe University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign， who studies how ageing affectsour cognitive abilities， we peak in our 20s. Though the decline is slow throughour 30s and on into our 50s， it is there； and after 55， it becomes moreprecipitous. In one study， he and his colleagues had both young and oldparticipants do a simulated driving task while carrying on a conversation. Hefound that while young drivers tended to miss background changes， older driversfailed to notice things that were highly relevant. Likewise， older subjects hadmore trouble paying attention to the more important parts of a scene than youngdrivers.
It＇s not all bad news for over-55s， though. Kramer alsofound that older people can benefit from practice. Not only did they learn toperform better， brain scans showed that underlying that improvement was achange in the way their brains become active.
Whileit＇s clear that practice can often make a difference， especially as we age， thebasic facts remain sobering. ＂We have this impression of an almightycomplex brain，＂ says Marois， ＂and yet we have very humbling andcrippling limits.＂ For most of our history， we probably never needed to domore than one thing at a time， he says， and so we haven＇t evolved to be ableto. Perhaps we will in future， though. We might yet look back one day on peoplelike Debbie and Alun as ancestors of a new breed of true multitaskers.

以上信息希望能幫助您在留學申請的道路上少走彎路。如果您還有更多問題或需要深入探討，不要猶豫，您可以在我們的留學官方網(wǎng)站上找到更豐富的考試資訊、留學指導和*專家咨詢服務(wù)。我們的團隊始終站在您的角度，為您的留學夢想全力以赴。祝您申請順利！

以上就是大學路小編整理的內(nèi)容，想要了解更多相關(guān)資訊內(nèi)容敬請關(guān)注大學路。