今天大學路小編整理了2023年7月10日雅思閱讀部分考試答案 2023年劍橋雅思閱讀真題解析:Thomas Young相關內(nèi)容,希望能幫助到大家,一起來看下吧。
本文目錄一覽:
2023年7月10日雅思閱讀部分考試答案
您好,我是專注留學考試規(guī)劃和留學咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學夢想的路上,選擇合適的學校和專業(yè),準備相關考試,都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經(jīng)驗的留學顧問,我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導。歡迎隨時提問!
2023年7月10日雅思考試已經(jīng)結束了,考完的同學肯定是很想知道考試答案的,雅思考試閱讀部分的答案已經(jīng)出來了,大家趕快來小鐘老師看看詳細的介紹吧!
一、2023年7月10日雅思閱讀部分考試答案
PASSAGE 1
主題:卡耐基(傳記)難易度:一般題型:判斷+填空+匹配
答案待回憶
PASSAGE 2
主題:古埃及造船難易度:較難題型:段落匹配+填空
答案待回憶
PASSAGE 3
主題:達爾文研究難易度:難題型:匹配+單選+判斷
27 - 31 匹配
27. 選explain the meaning of evolutionary psychology
28. 選我們的興趣和個性是祖先遺傳給我們的
29. 選情感很重要對應改變管理效率
30. 選未來職場社交依然保持強勢
31. 選達爾文進化論對現(xiàn)代工作環(huán)境有影響
32 - 35 判斷
32. True
33. False34. Not given35. False
36 - 40 填空
36. business environment
37. MBA graduates
38. back-to-front thinking
39. magic forumla40. human nature
二、雅思閱讀提速方法
1、速讀訓練
雅思閱讀考察的是一個考生的閱讀理解能力,更是考察關鍵信息的獲取能力,所以考生未必要讀完全部內(nèi)容才開始做題,只要在短時間內(nèi)消化文章的關鍵信息即可,所以訓練速讀能力很重要,比如關鍵信息一般出現(xiàn)在文章開頭,段落的首句或結尾,次要部分要害信息出現(xiàn)在轉折語段,掌握這些基本的獲取關鍵信息技巧,就可以爭奪足夠多的時間了。
2、題型技巧
因為速讀并不能解決全部問題,在遇到不同的閱讀題型時,我們也應該注意各類題型的解題方法,其中主旨題(List of Headings):主要考察的是考生的概括能力,那么速讀對主旨定位的幫助很大,但遇到一些考察細節(jié)的題目(判斷題T/F/NG、選擇題Multiple Choice等),則需要你能夠迅速定位題目與原文中的關鍵詞。
3、同義替換
除了部分專有名詞無法替換之外,其實雅思閱讀處處可見同義替換,同義替換的方式太多,同義詞、近義詞、短語,甚至句型轉換都有可能進行替換。
4、積累詞匯
很多單詞看不懂的結果就是每個句子都看不懂,只能硬著頭皮看下去。多看幾句,又忘了前面在講什么,又回頭看,這樣速度怎么可能快?其實雅思閱讀文章有很多學術詞匯,這類專業(yè)詞匯并不會影響考生們做題,適當進行拓展閱讀即可了解到,所以不必過分追求這些詞匯。
三、雅思閱讀題型
paragraph headings(段落標題)
會有10個左右的標題選項出現(xiàn)在閱讀文章的后面,其中會包含一個或兩個段落和其標題的幾個例子,這種題目要求考生對給出的段落在文章內(nèi)容中找出相匹配的段落標題,雖然題目給出的標題適用于多個段落,但在正式的考試中一個選項只能適用于一個段落。
回答問題
根據(jù)文章或圖表回答問題這種題目是考察考生對信息的篩選和提取能力,如用下列單詞提問what、which、when、where、who、whose、whom、why、 how等。辨別正誤題型
該題型還包括(not given / not mentioned)沒有提到,有時還會出現(xiàn)下列提法精確/不精確、一致/不一致、正確與不正確,辨別正誤題型屬于難度比較大的題型通常在閱讀測試中的第三或者第四部分出現(xiàn)。
摘要、填空題型
填空題通常有兩種形式:一種是根據(jù)文章內(nèi)容選擇詞或短語填空,第二種形式是利用所給單詞或短語讓考生填空,上述兩種形式填空題都需要借助語法、詞法知識分析所需填空文章中相關句子的含義。
配對題(matching)
配對的范圍主要包括新產(chǎn)品的發(fā)明家、發(fā)明時間、事件和事件的發(fā)展經(jīng)過、事件發(fā)生的原因和結果、文章內(nèi)容中概念的解釋和標志性事物及其所處的年代等等。
多重選擇題型
雅思閱讀測試中的多重選擇題型與托福測試中的多重選擇題型,雖然類似實質(zhì)上差別很大,雅思閱讀測試中的多重選擇題型更多側重于對文章的理解而非強調(diào)語法、詞法的運用。
完成句子題型
這種題目比較花時間需要考生根據(jù)選項在文章仔細的尋找相關的信息,這也是考察小伙伴們篩選信息和提取信息的能力。
四、雅思閱讀備考須知
1 烤鴨們在備考雅思閱讀第一步不要瘋狂做劍橋真題,資源是有限的,你應該先夯實高頻詞匯和必備的語法內(nèi)容。
2 最好的雅思閱讀備考材料,除了劍橋真題還是劍橋真題。
3 雅思閱讀高頻單詞你可以從練習中歸納,但對于時間很緊的同學使用一本好的單詞書也不失為好的選擇。
4 時間是我們最大的敵人,大家千萬別養(yǎng)成拖沓的習慣,規(guī)定時間完成規(guī)定練習時必須的。
5 如果不能20分鐘完成一篇閱讀文章,你可以試著用漸進法練習,先以25分鐘練習,慢慢縮減到23分鐘,最終達到考試要求。
6 閱讀單項很在意正確率和時間兩個環(huán)節(jié),而這兩個環(huán)節(jié)很難同時提高,烤鴨們首先應該提高的是正確率,在正確率穩(wěn)定的前提下,訓練速度。
7 對于閱讀中的判斷題你一定要看清要求到底是填TRUE還是YES,雖然有時候不扣分,但是我們最好不要在考試體驗冒險的感覺。
8 判斷題最難區(qū)別的是錯和未提到(False和Not Given),但是最難判斷的是對(True),因為原文和題目之間經(jīng)過了復雜的統(tǒng)一轉換和句型變化。
9 小標題不要只是尋找每一段的第一句和最后一句,數(shù)據(jù)顯示這樣做只有三分之一的正確率,想要更多分數(shù),你還要關注文中轉折詞出現(xiàn)的地方。
10 小標題題型中的NB是不需要閱讀的,要么是廢話,要么是謊話。
11 段落中問句的后面和舉例子的前面也許會出現(xiàn)主題句。
12 兩個選項雌雄難辨,優(yōu)先選擇后一個選項。
希望以上的答復能對您的留學申請有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細的問題或需要進一步的協(xié)助,我強烈推薦您訪問我們的留學官方網(wǎng)站
,在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學考試規(guī)劃和留學資料以及*的咨詢服務。祝您留學申請順利!
2023年9月28日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案
您好,我是專注留學考試規(guī)劃和留學咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學夢想的路上,選擇合適的學校和專業(yè),準備相關考試,都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經(jīng)驗的留學顧問,我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導。歡迎隨時提問!
昨天剛剛結束了最新一期的雅思考試,大家有沒有被難倒呢?接下來就跟著小鐘老師來看一看2023年9月28日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案。
Passage1: 希臘硬幣Greek coinage
參考答案:
1. 希臘coin早在3000年就出現(xiàn)了=F
2. T
3. Sparta地區(qū)侵略Athens并強制Athens用他們的貨幣=F
4. Great coins在整個歐洲流傳=F
5. Persian 入侵了Lydia并且使用人家的硬幣=T
6. 用硬幣上的頭像來獎勵做出杰出貢獻的人=NG
7. mint
8. stamps
9. anvil
10. reserve dies
11. 希臘硬幣的重量至少=0.15g
12. 硬幣的圖案=the king的頭像
13. 希臘被波斯征服之前的花紋是lion and doil
14. coin 在雅典被稱為 owl
Passage2: 悉尼交通標識Street markers in Sydney
Passage3: Musical Maladies
參考答案:
A. Music and the brain are both endlessly fascinating subjects, and as a neuroscientist specializing in auditory learning and memory, I find them especially intriguing. So I had high expectations of Musicophilia, the latest offering from neurologist and prolific author Oliver Sacks. And I confess to feeling a little guilty reporting that my reactions to the book are mixed.
B. Sacks himself is the best part of Musicophilia. He richly documents his own life in the book and reveals highly personal experiences. The photograph of him>C. The preface gives a good idea of what the book will deliver. In it Sacks explains that he wants to convey the insights gleaned from the enormous and rapidly growing body of work>complex and often bizarre disorders to which these are prone." He also stresses the importance of the simple art of observation" and the richness of the human context. He wants to combine observation and description with the latest in technology,” he says, and to imaginatively enter into the experience of his patients and subjects. The reader can see that Sacks, who has been practicing neurology for 40 years, is torn between the old-fashioned path of observation and the new-fangled, high-tech approach: He knows that he needs to take heed of the latter, but his heart lies with the former.
D. The book consists mainly of detailed descriptions of cases, most of them involving patients whom Sacks has seen in his practice. Brief discussions of contemporary neuroscientific reports are sprinkled liberally throughout the text. Part I, Haunted by Music," begins with the strange case of Tony Cicoria, a nonmusical, middle-aged surgeon who was consumed by a love of music after being hit by lightning. He suddenly began to crave listening to piano music, which he had never cared for in the past. He started to play the piano and then to compose music, which arose spontaneously in his mind in a torrent of notes. How could this happen? Was I the cause psychological? (He had had a near-death experience when the lightning struck him.) Or was it the direct result of a change in the auditory regions of his cerebral cortex? Electro-encephalography (EEG) showed his brain waves to be normal in the mid-1990s, just after his trauma and subsequent conversion to music. There are now more sensitive tests, but Cicoria has declined to undergo them; he does not want to delve into the causes of his musicality. What a shame!
E. Part II, “A Range of Musicality,” covers a wider variety of topics,but unfortunately, some of the chapters offer little or nothing that is new. For example, chapter 13, which is five pages long, merely notes that the blind often have better hearing than the sighted. The most interesting chapters are those that present the strangest cases. Chapter 8 is about “ amusia, ” an inability to hear sounds as music, and “dysharmonia,”a highly specific impairment of the ability to hear harmony, with the ability to understand melody left intact. Such specific dissociations are found throughout the cases Sacks recounts.
F. To Sacks's credit, part III, "Memory, Movement and Music," brings us into the underappreciated realm of music therapy. Chapter 16 explains how "melodic intonation therapy" is being used to help expressive aphasic patients (those unable to express their thoughts verbally following a stroke or other cerebral incident)>G. To readers who are unfamiliar with neuroscience and music behavior, Musicophilia may be something of a revelation. But the book will not satisfy those seeking the causes and implications of the phenomena Sacks describes. For>appears to be more at ease discussing patients than discussing experiments. And he tends to be rather uncritical in accepting scientific findings and theories.
H. It's true that the causes of music-brain oddities remain poorly understood. However, Sacks could have done more to draw out some of the implications of the careful observations that he and other neurologists have made and of the treatments that have been successful. For example, he might have noted that the many specific dissociations among components of music comprehension, such as loss of the ability to perceive harmony but not melody, indicate that there is no music center in the brain. Because many people who read the book are likely to believe in the brain localization of all mental functions, this was a missed educational opportunity.
I. Another conclusion>patient. Treatments mentioned seem to be almost exclusively antiepileptic medications, which "damp down" the excitability of the brain in general; their effectiveness varies widely.
J. Finally, in many of the cases described here the patient with music-brain symptoms is reported to have "normal" EEG results. Although Sacks recognizes the existence of new technologies, among them far more sensitive ways to *yze brain waves than the standard neurological EEG test, he does not call for their use. In fact, although he exhibits the greatest compassion for patients, he conveys no sense of urgency about the pursuit of new avenues in the diagnosis and treatment of music-brain disorders. This absence echoes the book's preface, in which Sacks expresses fear that the simple art of observation may be lost" if we rely too much on new technologies. He does call for both approaches, though, and we can only hope that the neurological community will respond.
27-30:B C A A
31-36:YES NG NO NG YES NO
37-40:F B A D
希望以上的答復能對您的留學申請有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細的問題或需要進一步的協(xié)助,我強烈推薦您訪問我們的留學官方網(wǎng)站
,在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學考試規(guī)劃和留學資料以及*的咨詢服務。祝您留學申請順利!
2023年劍橋雅思閱讀真題解析:Thomas Young
您好,我是專注留學考試規(guī)劃和留學咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學夢想的路上,選擇合適的學校和專業(yè),準備相關考試,都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經(jīng)驗的留學顧問,我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導。歡迎隨時提問!
對于雅思考生來說,劍橋雅思閱讀題難不難?下面就和小鐘老師一起來看看2023年劍橋雅思閱讀真題解析:Thomas Young。
Thomas Young
The Last True Know-It-All
A Thomas Young (1773-1829) contributed 63 articles to the Encyclopedia Britannica, including 46 biographical entries (mostly on scientists and classicists) and substantial essays on "Bridge,” "Chromatics," "Egypt," "Languages" and "Tides". Was someone who could write authoritatively about so many subjects a polymath, a genius or a dilettante? In an ambitious new biography, Andrew Robinson argues that Young is a good contender for the epitaph "the last man who knew everything." Young has competition, however: The phrase, which Robinson takes for his title, also serves as the subtitle of two other recent biographies: Leonard Warren's 1998 life of paleontologist Joseph Leidy (1823-1891) and Paula Findlen's 2023 book on Athanasius Kircher (1602-1680), another polymath.
B Young, of course, did more than write encyclopedia entries. He presented his first paper to the Royal Society of London at the age of 20 and was elected a Fellow a week after his 21st birthday. In the paper, Young explained the process of accommodation in the human eye on how the eye focuses properly on objects at varying distances. Young hypothesized that this was achieved by changes in the shape of the lens. Young also theorized that light traveled in waves and he believed that, to account for the ability to see in color, there must be three receptors in the eye corresponding to the three "principal colors" to which the retina could respond: red, green, violet. All these hypothesis were subsequently proved to be correct.
C Later in his life, when he was in his forties, Young was instrumental in cracking the code that unlocked the unknown script on the Rosetta Stone, a tablet that was "found" in Egypt by the Napoleonic army in 1799. The stone contains text in three alphabets: Greek, something unrecognizable and Egyptian hieroglyphs. The unrecognizable script is now known as demotic and, as Young deduced, is related directly to hieroglyphic. His initial work on this appeared in his Britannica entry on Egypt. In another entry, he coined the term Indo-European to describe the family of languages spoken throughout most of Europe and northern India. These are the landmark achievements of a man who was a child prodigy and who, unlike many remarkable children, did not disappear into oblivion as an *.
D Born in 1773 in Somerset in England, Young lived from an early age with his maternal grandfather, eventually leaving to attend boarding school. He haddevoured books from the age of two, and through his own initiative he excelled at Latin, Greek, mathematics and natural philosophy. After leaving school, he was greatly encouraged by his mother's uncle, Richard Brocklesby, a physician and Fellow of the Royal Society. Following Brocklesby's lead, Young decided to pursue a career in medicine. He studied in London, following the medical circuit, and then moved on to more formal education in Edinburgh, Gottingen and Cambridge. After completing his medical training at the University of Cambridge in 1808, Young set up practice as a physician in London. He soon became a Fellow of the Royal College of Physicians and a few years later was appointed physician at St. George's Hospital.
E Young's skill as a physician, however, did not equal his skill as a scholar of natural philosophy or linguistics. Earlier, in 1801, he had been appointed to a professorship of natural philosophy at the Royal Institution, where he delivered as many as 60 lectures in a year. These were published in two volumes in 1807. In 1804 Young had become secretary to the Royal Society, a post he would hold until his death. His opinions were sought on civic and national matters, such as the introduction of gas lighting to London and methods of ship construction. From 1819 he was superintendent of the Nautical Almanac and secretary to the Board of Longitude. From 1824 to 1829 he was physician to and inspector of calculations for the Palladian Insurance Company. Between 1816 and 1825 he contributed his many and various entries to the Encyclopedia Britannica, and throughout his career he authored numerous books, essays and papers.
F Young is a perfect subject for a biography - perfect, but daunting. Few men contributed so much to so many technical fields. Robinson's aim is to introduce non-scientists to Young's work and life. He succeeds, providing clear expositions of the technical material (especially that on optics and Egyptian hieroglyphs). Some readers of this book will, like Robinson, find Young's accomplishments impressive; others will see him as some historians have - as a dilettante. Yet despite the rich material presented in this book, readers will not end up knowing Young personally. We catch glimpses of a playful Young, doodling Greek and Latin phrases in his notes on medical lectures and translating the verses that a young lady had written on the walls of a summerhouse into Greek elegiacs. Young was introduced into elite society, attended the theatre and learned to dance and play the flute. In addition, he was an accomplished horseman. However, his personal life looks pale next to his vibrant career and studies.
G Young married Eliza Maxwell in 1804, and according to Robinson, "their marriage was a happy one and she appreciated his work." Almost all we know about her is that she sustained her husband through some rancorous disputes about optics and that she worried about money when his medical career was slow to take off. Very little evidence survives about the complexities of Young's relationships with his mother and father. Robinson does not credit them, or anyone else, with shaping Young's extraordinary mind. Despite the lack of details concerning Young's relationships, however, anyone interested in what it means to be a genius should read this book.
Questions 1-7
Do the following statements agree with the information given in Reading Passage 1?
In boxes 1-6 on your answer sheet, write
TRUE if the statement is true
FALSE if the statement is false
NOT GIVEN if the information is not given in the passage
1 “The last man who knew everything” has also been claimed to other people.
2 All Young’s articles were published in Encyclopedia Britannica.
3 Like others, Young wasn't so brilliant when grew up.
4 Young's talents as a doctor are surpassing his other skills.
5 Young's advice was sought by people responsible for local and national issues.
6 Young was interested in various social pastimes.
7 Young suffered from a disease in his later years.
Questions 8-13
Answer the questions below.
Choose NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS AND/OR A NUMBER from the passage for each answer.
8 How many life stories did Young write for Encyclopedia Britannica?
9 What aspect of scientific research did Young do in his first academic paper?
10 What name did Young introduce to refer to a group of languages?
11 Who inspired Young to start the medical studies?
12 Where did Young get a teaching position?
13 What contribution did Young make to London?
文章題目:
Thomas Young—The Last True Know-it All
托馬斯·楊——最后一個無所不知的人
篇章結構
體裁人物傳記
題目托馬斯·楊——最后一個無所不知的人
結構A段:托馬斯·楊對百科全書的主要成就
B段:托馬斯年輕時的主要成就
C段:托馬斯晚年的主要成就
D段:托馬斯童年的生活背景及成長經(jīng)歷
E段:托馬斯作為自然哲學學者取得的成就
F段: 托馬斯在其他領域的成就
G段:托馬斯的感情生活
試題分析
Question 1-7
題目類型:True / false /not given
題號定位詞文中對應點題目解析
1Other peopleA段第四句“Young has competition, however: The phrase, which Robinson takes for his title, also serves as the subtitle of two other recent biographies: Leonard Warren's 1998 life of paleontologist Joseph Leidy (1823-1891) and Paula Findlen's 2023 book on Athanasius Kircher (1602-1680), another polymath.”該句中明確給出了Young還有其他的競爭者,他們的傳記中也同樣擁有這樣的小標題,分別是Leonard Warren寫的關于Joseph Leidy的傳記,以及 Paula Findlen's寫的關于Athanasius Kircher的傳記。
因此,本題答案為True
2all, articlesB段第一、二句B段第一句 “Young, of course, did more than write encyclopedia entries.”明確表示Young所做的遠不僅僅是編輯大英百科全書的詞條,因此并不是所有的都在百科全書。而在本段第二句中,作者指出,Young在20歲的時候將自己的第一篇論文自薦給倫敦皇家學會,并在一年后成為該學會的會員: He presented his first paper to the Royal Society of London at the age of 20 and was elected a Fellow a week after his 21st birthday。Paper與article為近意思。顯然,題干與原文含義相反。
因此,本題答案為False
3likeC段最后一句C段整體是在介紹Young晚年的主要成就,即Young長大后的成就。此外,在C段最后一句中,作者明確指出Young和其他的孩子不同的一點在于,Young并沒有像其他那些年少成名而后來江郎才盡的孩子一樣,他后來同樣取得了非凡的成就: These are the landmark achievements of a man who was a child prodigy and who, unlike many remarkable children, did not disappear into oblivion as an *.句中的unlike為like的反義詞,顯然題干與原文含義相反。
因此,本題答案為False
4surpassingD段第四、七句D段介紹了Young的成長背景和經(jīng)歷,同時體現(xiàn)出其涉獵范圍較為廣泛。其中第四句中提到Young決定學醫(yī),并且在后面的介紹中指出Young還參加戲劇演出,學習跳舞和吹笛子: He then broke with his Quaker upbringing by attending the theater and learning to dance and play the flute. In addition, he was an accomplished horseman.而在第七句中作者指出Young還是一名杰出的馬術師。但是并未指出Young在哪個方面的造詣更高,更有天賦。Surpassing這個概念并沒有在文中體現(xiàn)。
因此,本題答案為Not Given
5soughtE段第四句“ His opinions were sought on civic and national matters”,文中表明Young的很多觀點關注人民和國家事務。題干與原文含義相同。
因此,本題答案為True
6Interested in, social pastimeF段第七句“We catch glimpses of a playful Young, doodling Greek and Latin phrases in his notes on medical lectures and translating the verses that a young lady had written on the walls of a summerhouse into Greek elegiacs.”文中指出,通過Young的醫(yī)學演講中亂寫的希臘字母和拉丁短語以及將一位年輕女性寫在涼亭上的詩歌翻譯成希臘挽歌便能看出他的幽默。顯然,Young對于這樣的社交娛樂是感興趣的。題干和原文相符合。
因此,本題答案為True
7disease, later yearsC段第一句,G段第一句C段第一句給出了“l(fā)ater in his life,”但是本段近講述了Young晚年在學術方面的成就;G段給出了Young的婚后生活,以及Robinson在書中并未提及Young與父母間的關系。但無論哪一個點都沒有提及其晚年飽受某種疾病之苦。
因此,本題答案為Not Given
題目類型:Short-answer question
8life storiesA段第一句“Thomas Young (1773-1829) contributed 63 articles to the Encyclopedia Britannica, including 46 biographical entries (mostly on scientists and classicists)…”該劇中的“biographical entries”指傳記詞條,與題干中的life stories表示相同涵義。
因此,本題答案為46
9first academic paperB段第三句“In the paper, on how the eye focuses properly on objects at varying distances, Young hypothesized that deformation of the crystalline lens accomplished the accommodation.”B段段首表明,Young將自己的第一篇論文自薦給了倫敦皇家學會學會。因此本段討論的是其第一篇論文。而本段第三句指出,在這篇論文中,Young主要討論了人類眼球的調(diào)節(jié)機制
因此,本題答案為humaneye或human eye accommodation
10a group of languagesC段第五句“In another entry, he coined the term Indo-European to describe the family of languages spoken throughout most of Europe and northern India.”該句指出,Young創(chuàng)造了術語 Indo-European來描述在歐洲大部分地區(qū)以及北印度使用的語言。
因此,本題答案為Indo-European
11inspire, medical studiesD段第四句D段前面介紹了Young童年時期的生活背景。本段第四句中則指出:“Following Brocklesby's lead, Young decided to pursue a career in medicine.”。顯然,正是因為 Richard Brocklesby的引導,Young才決定在醫(yī)學方面有所建樹。
因此,本題答案為 Richard Brocklesby
12teaching positionE段第二句“ Earlier, in 1801, he had been appointed to a professorship of natural philosophy at the Royal Institution”,題干中的teaching position與E段第二句中的professorship均表示“教師職位”,該句明確指出,Young作為自然哲學的教授,受聘于英國科學研究所。
因此,本題答案為 Royal Institution
13LondonE段第五句“His opinions were sought on civic and national matters, such as the introduction of gas lighting to London and methods of ship construction.”E段主要介紹了Young作為自然哲學學者取得的成就。而第五句則列舉了Young的兩個成就,其對于倫敦的所做出的成就在于煤氣照明的引入。
因此,本題答案為gas lighting
A我們該怎樣理解托馬斯·楊(1773-1829)?他是《大不列顛百科全書》中63篇文章的作者,其中包括46篇傳記(大部分都是關于科學家和古典學者),和大量關于“橋” “色彩論” “埃及” “語吉” “潮汐”等的論文。一個能夠寫出這樣多有權威性文章的人應該算是一個博學者? 一個天才?還是一個業(yè)余興趣廣泛的人呢?在一篇關于他的比較激進的傳記中,Andrew Robinson 認為托馬斯楊是-位強有力的競爭者能夠配得這樣的墓志銘“是最后一個知道任何事的人”。但是楊也要面對競爭:因為這樣的傳記標題Robinson不僅給了他,也作為副標題給了有關另兩位學者的傳記:Lenard Warren 1998年著的《古生物學家Joseph Leipy的一生》(1823-1891)以及Paula Findlen 2023年著的關于另一位博學者Athanasius Kircher(1602-1680)的傳記。
B當然楊的貢獻遠不止寫了很多百科全書上的文章,他在20歲的時候將自己的第一篇論文自薦給倫敦皇家學會,并在他的21歲生日后被評為一周科學人物,楊在該篇論文中解釋了人類眼睛的調(diào)節(jié)機制一一關于眼睛如何通過不同的距離聚焦在物體上。在后面的文章中,他更加全面地探討了這個問題,類似牛頓,他在自己身上進行了可怕的實驗用以獲得相關的證據(jù),他還得出這樣的理論:光是通過“以太”分子的振動,以波的形式進行傳遞的,而“以太”是一種假想物質(zhì),其存在還存在爭議性。他還認為為了能看見顏色,必須要有3個感應器對“三原色”進行感應,而這三種視網(wǎng)膜對其產(chǎn)生感應的顏色就是紅,黃,藍二種顏色。
C在他人生的晚些時候,也就是40多歲的時候,楊試圖破解鎖在羅塞塔石碑里的未知文字密碼,這個石碑是在1799年在埃及被拿破侖的軍隊發(fā)現(xiàn)的,并且從1802年起就在英國博物館進行展出。該石碑上包含了 3種不同的字母:希臘語,不可辨識的文字以及埃及的象形文字。這種不可辨識的文字現(xiàn)在被認為是正如楊所推斷的是很普通的,是和象形文字直接相關的。他最初有關這方面的工作首次出現(xiàn)在他在《大不列顛百科全書》中編纂的詞條。在另一個條目中,他創(chuàng)造了術語“Indo-European”來描述在歐洲大部分地區(qū)以及北印度使用的語言。這些都是這是這位從小就展露科學天賦并且不像很多孩子后來江郎才盡的科學家獲得的里程碑式的成就。
D托馬斯·楊出生在英國薩默塞特郡一個虔誠的教友會教徒家庭,從小和他的外公一起長大,最后去了寄宿學校。他兩歲的時候就博覽群書,并且自學熟練掌握了拉丁語,希臘語,數(shù)學以及哲學,在很大程度上他受到了舅舅Richard Brocklesby的鼓勵,他的舅舅也是英國皇家學會的一位內(nèi)科醫(yī)生。在Brocklesby的引導下,楊決定要在醫(yī)學方而有所建樹,他曾先后在倫敦大學、愛丁堡大學和格丁根大學學習醫(yī)學,多虧了Brocklesby的引薦,楊進入了英國皇家學會,他最后也打破了從小在教友會的教育,他參加戲劇演出,學習跳舞和吹笛子,此外,他還是一位杰出的馬術師。在1808年結束在劍橋大學的醫(yī)學學習后,楊在倫敦開了一家診所,很快他就成為皇家內(nèi)科醫(yī)生學會的一員,并且?guī)啄旰蟪蔀槭讨吾t(yī)院的一名內(nèi)科醫(yī)生。
E楊作為內(nèi)科醫(yī)生的醫(yī)術卻趕不上他作為自然哲學學者或是語言學家取得的成就,早在1801年,他已經(jīng)被任命為英國皇家學會的教授,他每年要在那里舉辦60場的講座。這些講座在1807年以兩本書的形式進行出版。1804年楊就已經(jīng)成為英國朵家學會的秘書,而他獲此殊榮直至去世。他的很多觀點關注人民和國家事務,比如說在倫敦引進煤氣照明和造船方法。從1819年起,他就是航海天文年歷的主要負責人,也是Board of Longitude的秘書。從1824年到1829年,他擔任Palladian 保險公司的精算師和內(nèi)科醫(yī)生。在1816年和1825年間,他為《大不列顛百科全書》編纂了許多詞條,而且窮其一生著作,論文無數(shù)。
F我們通過楊在醫(yī)學課上胡亂寫的希臘字母和拉丁文短語以及他將一位年輕的女士寫在避暑山莊墻上的詩句翻譯成挽歌可以看出他的幽默,但是他的個人生活也因為自己對工作和研究的全情投入而略顯蒼白。
G他在1804年和Eliza Maxwell結婚,據(jù)Robinson所述“他們的婚姻是幸福的,因為他的夫人欣賞他的工作”。我們對于他夫人的了解僅限于她在她丈夫備受一些關于眼睛的理論方面爭議的時候總是堅定地支持他,并且當他的醫(yī)學生涯開始慢慢起飛的時候,她開始有些擔心錢的問題。值得一提的是,楊沒有被保護的人,他都是和自己的導師進行互動一一先是他的外公,后是Brocklesby一一還有先于他過失的一些偉人(其中很多是很著名的如牛頓,楊最早在17歲讀了他寫的書)。但是關于楊和他母親以及父親的關系的記述卻鮮力人知,Robinson在說到楊的非凡的頭腦時也并沒有將其歸功于他的父母,或許很難有這樣的巧合:過去的天才都是由于卓越的父母教育造就的。
希望以上的答復能對您的留學申請有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細的問題或需要進一步的協(xié)助,我強烈推薦您訪問我們的留學官方網(wǎng)站
,在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學考試規(guī)劃和留學資料以及*的咨詢服務。祝您留學申請順利!
以上就是2023年7月10日雅思閱讀部分考試答案 2023年劍橋雅思閱讀真題解析:Thomas Young全部內(nèi)容,更多相關信息,敬請關注大學路。