2023年6月30日雅思閱讀真題整理 雅思《劍6》 test3 閱讀38到40題有問(wèn)題 劍橋雅思閱讀6 test3答案？

今天大學(xué)路小編為大家?guī)?lái)了2023年6月30日雅思閱讀真題整理 雅思《劍6》 test3 閱讀38到40題有問(wèn)題 劍橋雅思閱讀6 test3答案？，希望能幫助到大家，一起來(lái)看看吧！

本文目錄一覽：

• 1、2023年6月30日雅思閱讀真題整理
• 2、雅思《劍6》 test3 閱讀38到40題有問(wèn)題
• 3、劍橋雅思閱讀6 test3答案？

2023年6月30日雅思閱讀真題整理

您好，我是專注留學(xué)考試規(guī)劃和留學(xué)咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學(xué)夢(mèng)想的路上，選擇合適的學(xué)校和專業(yè)，準(zhǔn)備相關(guān)考試，都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的留學(xué)顧問(wèn)，我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導(dǎo)。歡迎隨時(shí)提問(wèn)！
對(duì)于2023年6月30日的雅思考試，不知道同學(xué)們對(duì)于此次考試有哪些把握呢？接下來(lái)就和小鐘老師來(lái)看看2023年6月30日雅思閱讀真題整理。

權(quán)威點(diǎn)評(píng)
文章題材常規(guī)，涉及到環(huán)境，動(dòng)物，商業(yè)類(lèi)。據(jù)烤鴨們反饋，passage 3生詞較多，導(dǎo)致原文和題干理解困難，影響做題。這要求考生在平時(shí)練習(xí)中多總結(jié)不同場(chǎng)景的高頻詞匯，并且提高在語(yǔ)境中理解生詞的能力。從題型看，難度適中，基礎(chǔ)題型：填空題(包括summary)和判斷題占30個(gè)左右，考查對(duì)于細(xì)節(jié)信息的定位和理解;匹配題考查了6個(gè)段落信息匹配題，考查學(xué)生在短時(shí)間內(nèi)準(zhǔn)確找到匹配段落信息的能力，考生必須掌握高效做匹配題的方法，在有限的時(shí)間內(nèi)拿到更多的分?jǐn)?shù)。
Passage 1
題目Why good ideas fail?
話題分類(lèi)商業(yè)類(lèi)
題型及對(duì)應(yīng)數(shù)量判斷題 5
填空題 8
內(nèi)容回憶一位市場(chǎng)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)專業(yè)的學(xué)生做了關(guān)于公司治理的案例，該公司早前獲得了成功，后來(lái)失敗了。兩位專家對(duì)該公司的營(yíng)銷(xiāo)進(jìn)行分析與評(píng)價(jià)，并且提出了一些市場(chǎng)營(yíng)銷(xiāo)的策略
題目回憶判斷題
1 TRUE
2 TRUE
3 NOT GIVEN
4 NOT GIVEN
5 FALSE
填空題
6 surface
7 name
8 需要補(bǔ)充
9 weight loss
10 behavior
11 focus group
12 simple survey
13 instincts
參考閱讀 10-3-1 商業(yè)類(lèi)
Passage 2
題目Hold back floods
話題分類(lèi)環(huán)境類(lèi)
題型及數(shù)量段落信息匹配 6
單選題 2
填空題 5
內(nèi)容回憶本文講述了主要講了洪水以前和現(xiàn)在的情況對(duì)比，以及治理洪水的新方法
Hold back flood
A Last winter’s floods on the rivers of central Europe were among the worst since the Middle Ages, and as winter storms return, the spectre of floods is returning too. Just weeks ago, the river Rh?ne in south-east France burst its banks, driving 15,000 people from their homes, and worse could be on the way. Traditionally, river engineers have gone for Plan A: get rid of the water fast, draining it off the land and down to the sea in tall-sided rivers re-engineered as high-performance drains. But however big they dug city drains, however wide and straight they made the rivers, and however high they build the banks, the floods kept coming back to taunt them, from the Mississippi to the Danube. And when the floods came, they seemed to be worse than ever. No wonder engineers are turning to Plan B: sap the water’s destructive strength by dispersing it into fields, forgotten lakes, flood plains and aquifers.
B Back in the days when rivers took a more tortuous path to the sea, flood waters lost impetus and volume while meandering across flood plains and idling through wetlands and inland deltas. But today the water tends to have an unimpeded journey to the sea. And this means that when it rains in the uplands, the water comes down all at once. Worse, whenever we close off more flood plains, the river’s flow farther downstream becomes more violent and uncontrollable. Dykes are only as good as their weakest link—and the water will unerringly find it. By trying to turn the complex hydrology of rivers into the simple mechanics of a water pipe, engineers have often created danger where they promised safety, and intensified the floods they meant to end. Take the Rhine, Europe’s most engineered river. For two centuries, German engineers have erased its backwaters and cut it off from its flood plain.
C Today, the river has lost 7 percent of its original length and runs up to a third faster. When it rains hard in the Alps, the peak flows from several tributaries coincide in the main river, where once they arrived separately. And with four-fifths of the lower Rhine’s flood plain barricaded off, the waters rise ever higher. The result is more frequent flooding that does ever-greater damage to the homes, offices and roads that sit on the flood plain. Much the same has happened in the US on the mighty Mississippi, which drains the world’s second largest river catchment into the Gulf of Mexico.
D The European Union is trying to improve rain forecasts and more accurately model how intense rains swell rivers. That may help cities prepare, but it won’t stop the floods. To do that, say hydrologists, you need a new approach to engineering not just rivers, but the whole landscape. The UK’s Environment Agency—which has been granted an extra ￡150 million a year to spend in the wake of floods in 2000 that cost the country ￡1billion—puts it like this: “The focus is now on working with the forces of nature. Towering concrete walls are out, and new wetlands are in.” to help keep London’s feet dry, the agency is breaking the Thames’s banks upstream and reflooding 10 square kilometres of ancient flood plain at Otmoor outside Oxford. Nearer to London it has spent ￡100 million creating new wetlands and a relief channel across 16 kilometres of flood plain to protect the town of Maidenhead, as well as the ancient playing fields of Eton college. And near the south coast, the agency is digging out channels to reconnect old meanders on the river Cuckmere in East Sussex that were cut off by flood banks 150 years ago.
E The same is taking place on a much grander scale in Austria, in one of Europe’s largest river restorations to date. Engineers are regenerating flood plains along 60 kilometres of the river Drava as it exits the Alps. They are also widening the river bed and channeling it back into abandoned meanders, oxbow lakes and backwaters overhung with willows. The engineers calculate that the restored flood plain can now store up to 10 million cubic metres of flood waters and slow storm surges coming out of the Alps by more than an hour, protecting towns as far downstream as Slovenia and Croatia.
F "Rivers have to be allowed to take more space. They have to be turned from flood-chutes into flood-foilers", says Nienhuis. And the Dutch. for whom preventing floods is a matter of survival. Have gone furthest. A nation built largely on drained marshes and seabed had the fright of its life in 1993 when the Rhine almost overwhelmed it. The same happened again in 1995. when a quarter of a million people were evacuated from the Netherlands. But a new breed of "soil engineers" wants our cities to become porous, and Berlin is their shining example. Since reunification, the city's massive redevelopment has been governed by tough new rules to prevent its drains becoming overloaded after heavy rains. Harald Kraft, an architect working in the city. says: "We now see rainwater as a resource to be kept rather than got rid of at great cost." A good illustration is the giant Potsdamer Platz, a huge new commercial redevelopment by Daimler Chrysler in the heart of the city.
G Los Angeles has spent billions of dollars digging huge drains and concreting river beds to carry away the water from occasional intense storms. The latest plan is to spend a cool 280millionraisingtheconcretewallsontheLosAngelesriverbyanother2metres.Yetmanycommunitiesstillfloodregularly.MeanwhilethisdesertcityisshippinginwaterfromhundredsofkilometresawayinnorthernCaliforniaandfromtheColoradoriverinArizonatofillitstapsandswimmingpools,andirrigateitsgreenspaces.Itallsoundslikebadplanning."InLAwereceivehalfthewaterweneedinrainfall,andwethrowitaway.Thenwespendhundredsofmillionstoimportwater,"saysAndyLipkis,anLAenvironmentalist,alongwithcitizengroupslikeFriendsoftheLosAngelesRiverandUnpavedLA.wanttobeattheurbanfloodhazardandfillthetapsbyholdingontothecity′sfloodwater.Andit′snotjustapipedream.Theauthoritiesthisyearlauncheda280millionraisingtheconcretewallsontheLosAngelesriverbyanother2metres.Yetmanycommunitiesstillfloodregularly.MeanwhilethisdesertcityisshippinginwaterfromhundredsofkilometresawayinnorthernCaliforniaandfromtheColoradoriverinArizonatofillitstapsandswimmingpools,andirrigateitsgreenspaces.Itallsoundslikebadplanning."InLAwereceivehalfthewaterweneedinrainfall,andwethrowitaway.Thenwespendhundredsofmillionstoimportwater,"saysAndyLipkis,anLAenvironmentalist,alongwithcitizengroupslikeFriendsoftheLosAngelesRiverandUnpavedLA.wanttobeattheurbanfloodhazardandfillthetapsbyholdingontothecity′sfloodwater.Andit′snotjustapipedream.Theauthoritiesthisyearlauncheda100 million scheme to road-test the porous city in one flood-hit community in Sun Valley. The plan is to catch the rain that falls on thousands of driveways, parking lots and rooftops in the valley. Trees will soak up water from parking lots. Homes and public buildings will capture roof water to irrigate gardens and parks. And road drains will empty into old gravel pits and other leaky places that should recharge the city's underground water reserves. Result: less flooding and more water for the city. Plan B says every city should be porous, every river should have room to flood naturally and every coastline should be left to build its own defenses. It sounds expensive and utopian, until you realize how much we spend trying to drain cities and protect our watery margins—and how bad we are at it.
題目回憶段落信息匹配題
1. A new approach conducted in the UK D
2. Reasons why twisty path and dykes failed B
3. One project on a river benefits three countries E
4. Illustration of an alternative plan in LA which seems unrealistic G
5. Efforts made in Netherlands and Germany F
6. Traditional ways of controlling flood A
選擇題
7. A It may stop the flood involving the whole area
8. D reserve water to protect downstream towns
填空題
9. Berlin set a good example for others.
10. The Rhine and the Mississippi river had the similar problem of water control.
11. An area near Oxford was flooded to protect the city of London.
12. Such planners who want our cities to become porous are called soil engineers.
13. In Los Angeles, *all scale water project could become a larger one.
參考閱讀532(環(huán)境類(lèi))
Passage 3
題目Australian Megafauna
話題分類(lèi)生物類(lèi)
題型及數(shù)量判斷題 4
summary 5
選擇題 5
內(nèi)容回憶對(duì)澳大利亞大型動(dòng)物megafauna的研究，分析人類(lèi)在幾千年前人是否與大型動(dòng)物共存。有研究者質(zhì)疑證據(jù)不足
題目回憶判斷題
27 YES
28 NOT GIVEN
29 NO
30 YES
SUMMARY 題
31 B
32 H
33 D
34 C
35 G
選擇題
36 A
37 B
38 A
39 C
40 D

希望以上的答復(fù)能對(duì)您的留學(xué)申請(qǐng)有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細(xì)的問(wèn)題或需要進(jìn)一步的協(xié)助，我強(qiáng)烈推薦您訪問(wèn)我們的留學(xué)官方網(wǎng)站 ，在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學(xué)考試規(guī)劃和留學(xué)資料以及*的咨詢服務(wù)。祝您留學(xué)申請(qǐng)順利！

雅思《劍6》 test3 閱讀38到40題有問(wèn)題

嚴(yán)格地說(shuō)，全錯(cuò)Lz

沒(méi)有什么 “雖然和答案不一樣，但是我覺(jué)得我這樣也是對(duì)的啊”這樣的說(shuō)辭

不客氣地說(shuō)一句 這種心態(tài)是一種 僥幸的心態(tài)，覺(jué)得自己寫(xiě)的和書(shū)里給的答案沾上邊了，意思都一樣，只不過(guò)部分單詞不同

沒(méi)錯(cuò)，你現(xiàn)在可以這么和我們說(shuō)，可是你考試的時(shí)候跟誰(shuí)說(shuō)去，考官才不管你想表達(dá)的意思是一樣的，對(duì)就是對(duì)，錯(cuò)就是錯(cuò)，只要你寫(xiě)的和參考答案上所給的所有答案都不一樣，你的答案就是錯(cuò)的

IELTS閱讀題是客觀題，all keys are from the passage,所以不存在模棱兩可的情況 我最后強(qiáng)調(diào)一遍 你必須要改掉這種僥幸心理，嚴(yán)格按照答案上給的形式來(lái)，到時(shí)候考試才不會(huì)因?yàn)槠磳?xiě)和格式這些低級(jí)錯(cuò)誤犯錯(cuò)而扣冤枉分！

ok，說(shuō)完心態(tài)，下面具體anylyse這三道題

原則性的東西先交代下 原則一： 這種題目 最好只能 減詞（ 冠詞 --介詞--修飾詞） 其他的一概不要變動(dòng)

38 先定位到答案是 the amount of glucose
no more than three words: amount of glucose
no more than two words: amount glucose ，發(fā)現(xiàn)說(shuō)不通，繼續(xù)減，變成答案glucose

不要把 amount提到后面去 因?yàn)橐呀?jīng)有介詞of了 amount of 是一個(gè)整體 要省一起省，要留一起留，題目規(guī)定是no more than two words，所以只能省略

39 首先看到原文兩句話是
One possibility relates to the ATP-making machinery's emission of the free radicals,which are thought……age-related diseases as cancer by damaging cells.Reduced operation of the machinery should limit their……

正確的做題 是定位到第一句話，第二句話是干擾項(xiàng)，根本就是個(gè)坑等著你跳的，然后你就毫不猶豫的跳下去了……

看題干 cells less damaged by disease because fewer_____ are emitted

題干里cells less damaged 對(duì)應(yīng)原文 by damaging cells
disease 對(duì)應(yīng)原文 such age-related diseases as cancer
emitted(發(fā)出光 射線) 對(duì)應(yīng)原文 emission of free radicals

綜上所述 題干就是第一句話的同意轉(zhuǎn)化 只不過(guò)原文是which引導(dǎo)的一個(gè) 被動(dòng)語(yǔ)態(tài) 的從句 題干則是主動(dòng)態(tài) 說(shuō)的都是一個(gè)意思
那么答案還找不到么？肯定是第一句的 free radicals

你的答案現(xiàn)在知道荒唐的地方了吧？你根本就是定位錯(cuò)了地方，找到第二句去了……第二句正好有 什么 operation of the machinery 后面也有一個(gè)damage來(lái)干擾你 但是你讀讀整句話，是題干的同意轉(zhuǎn)化么？你句子都找錯(cuò)了地方，還敢說(shuō)“雖然和答案不一樣，但是我覺(jué)得我這樣也是對(duì)的啊。”

現(xiàn)在覺(jué)得你的振振有詞 有點(diǎn)底氣不足了吧？
再看第三題 徹底讓你印象深刻，記住閱讀的心態(tài)和方法！

40 先看原文 emphasizes preservation of the organi*……
再看題干cells focus on___because……

emphasizes與focus on明顯同意轉(zhuǎn)化， 原文里emphasizes后緊跟的是 preservation of the organi*

以后的分析同38

關(guān)于補(bǔ)充，這沒(méi)有普遍的規(guī)律，最主要還是看題目要求 只能 具體問(wèn)題具體分析 但有個(gè)原則你記住是沒(méi)錯(cuò)的 ：言多必失，像這種no more than……的 回答三個(gè)字不如回答兩個(gè)字，回答兩個(gè)字不如回答最核心的名詞 如果你不是百分百肯定，寫(xiě)最簡(jiǎn)單的核心名詞是最保險(xiǎn)的。

ok，題目說(shuō)完了 最后說(shuō)幾句題外話，
孩子，IELTS是有難度的，你當(dāng)隨便大街上拉個(gè)人去考IELTS都能 先迅速定位 再梳理 主謂賓 最后分析出這些語(yǔ)法 確定是同意轉(zhuǎn)化么？

只有不斷地練習(xí) 才能在實(shí)戰(zhàn)里總結(jié)出IELTS的技巧和規(guī)律
就像我說(shuō)的這些原則，有些是培訓(xùn)班老師說(shuō)過(guò)，有些沒(méi)人跟我說(shuō)過(guò)，是我 劍橋 系列做過(guò)N遍后自己總結(jié)出來(lái)的，并且屢試不爽。
所以 要想在閱讀上不犯錯(cuò)誤，如魚(yú)得水，每道題都能分析的頭頭是道，事先你要付出的努力是平常人數(shù)倍的辛苦和汗水。究竟怎么權(quán)衡，還是要自己多想想

關(guān)于LZ補(bǔ)充的補(bǔ)充……

首先很高興你能說(shuō)我的回答是中肯的 我就怕有人看我語(yǔ)氣強(qiáng)烈點(diǎn)批評(píng)多點(diǎn) 就不高興了 但實(shí)際上我說(shuō)的都是實(shí)情，使用棒喝有助于你們盡快警醒自身的問(wèn)題

其次 不要用 您 來(lái)稱呼我 我表示鴨梨很大 我才21

最后 回答劍7-test2-14
聽(tīng)力原文是 ……you can visit the fine 16th century palace here built for the king with its beautiful formal gardens

答案給的是 （formal）garden

修飾詞+核心名詞 其中formal 是修飾詞，可以省略，關(guān)于這個(gè)gardens，我確實(shí)糾結(jié)了一下，錄音和scripts給的都是加了s的，答案沒(méi)有s，我只能猜測(cè)這是印刷錯(cuò)誤:答案少印了s,或者忘在s上面打上括號(hào)

當(dāng)然，這也可以算我的狡辯吧，如果這里面真有什么很特殊的含義，我也相信這只是小小的例外，絕大部分情況的答案是完美的印證了我所說(shuō)的原則，并且我說(shuō)的按照答案來(lái)規(guī)范書(shū)寫(xiě)格式，我繼續(xù) 保留意見(jiàn) ，我相信照著做比天馬行空的按自己想的來(lái)，要保險(xiǎn)的多

英國(guó)人是保守而刻板的， IELTS考試 也是一樣

劍橋雅思閱讀6 test3答案？

關(guān)鍵詞： 3000 BC, cocoon, fell into, emperor's wife

定位原文: 第1段第5句“It just so happened that... ” 這些蠶繭中的一粒掉進(jìn)了熱茶中并開(kāi)始松散成為一根細(xì)絲。

解題思路: “3000BC”和“皇帝的妻子”都很好定位，在第一段的第二句中便可看到，但卻偏偏沒(méi)有“掉進(jìn)”這個(gè)信息，直到讀者看到第五句中的landed in這個(gè)同義表述才能恍然大悟，答案為tea。

【附解析】

Question 2

答案： reel

關(guān)鍵詞： emperor's wife, invented, pull out silk fibres

定位原文： 第1段第8句“She also devised a special reel to draw... ”她還設(shè)計(jì)發(fā)明了一種特殊的卷軸來(lái)將蠶繭中的纖維紡成絲線。

解題思路： 此題的定位距離上一道題不遠(yuǎn)，仍是皇帝妻子所做的事。題干說(shuō)“皇帝的妻子發(fā)明了一個(gè) _____ 來(lái)拽出絲綢纖維”，讀者只需回到原文找到devised這個(gè)對(duì)invented進(jìn)行同義表述的單詞，即不難發(fā)現(xiàn)答案為reel。

免責(zé)聲明：文章內(nèi)容來(lái)自網(wǎng)絡(luò)，如有侵權(quán)請(qǐng)及時(shí)聯(lián)系刪除。