雅思劍橋12Passage1：不同尋常的木材 2023年2月1日雅思閱讀真題回憶

今天大學(xué)路小編整理了雅思劍橋12Passage1：不同尋常的木材 2023年2月1日雅思閱讀真題回憶相關(guān)信息，希望在這方面能夠更好幫助到大家。

本文目錄一覽：

• 1、雅思劍橋12Passage1：不同尋常的木材
• 2、2023年2月1日雅思閱讀真題回憶
• 3、請(qǐng)問2023年3月2日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案

雅思劍橋12Passage1：不同尋常的木材

您好，我是專注留學(xué)考試規(guī)劃和留學(xué)咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學(xué)夢(mèng)想的路上，選擇合適的學(xué)校和專業(yè)，準(zhǔn)備相關(guān)考試，都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的留學(xué)顧問，我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導(dǎo)。歡迎隨時(shí)提問！
劍橋雅思12是現(xiàn)在備考雅思的最新資料，不知道同學(xué)們有沒有呢？今天就和小鐘老師一起來看看雅思劍橋12Passage1：不同尋常的木材。

文章結(jié)構(gòu)
體裁：說明文
主要內(nèi)容：介紹了一種不同尋常的材奉I(lǐng)——軟木
結(jié)構(gòu)：
1段軟木來源、特性、用途的簡(jiǎn)介
2段栓皮櫟樹皮的特性
3段栓皮櫟樹的絲長(zhǎng)環(huán)境
4段軟木的生長(zhǎng)周期長(zhǎng)和收獲間隔長(zhǎng)
5段軟木的收割和加
6段軟木的現(xiàn)狀（或缺點(diǎn)）：被其他材料代替
7段軟木的前景（或優(yōu)點(diǎn)）：高品質(zhì)、環(huán)保
考題解析：
Questions 1-5
1題目歸類：TRUE/FALSVNOT GIVEN
此類題型屬于細(xì)節(jié)題，是雅思閱讀中難度較小的題目此類題目考臺(tái)題表述的息與原文相關(guān)信息的關(guān)系。在解題時(shí)，根據(jù)題目的定位詞回，1文找到相關(guān)的語(yǔ)，如果原文與題目表述的信息一致，答案為TRUE；如果原文與題目表述的息矛」答案為FALSE；如果從原文的信息不能確定題目中所表述的ffi息，答案為NOT GIVEN
文章結(jié)構(gòu)
體裁：說明文
主要內(nèi)容：介紹了一種不同尋常的材奉I(lǐng)——軟木
結(jié)構(gòu)：
1段軟木來源、特性、用途的簡(jiǎn)介
2段栓皮櫟樹皮的特性
3段栓皮櫟樹的絲長(zhǎng)環(huán)境
4段軟木的生長(zhǎng)周期長(zhǎng)和收獲間隔長(zhǎng)
5段軟木的收割和加
6段軟木的現(xiàn)狀（或缺點(diǎn)）：被其他材料代替
7段軟木的前景（或優(yōu)點(diǎn)）：高品質(zhì)、環(huán)保
考題解析：
Questions 1-5
1題目歸類：TRUE/FALSVNOT GIVEN
此類題型屬于細(xì)節(jié)題，是雅思閱讀中難度較小的題目此類題目考臺(tái)題表述的息與原文相關(guān)信息的關(guān)系。在解題時(shí)，根據(jù)題目的定位詞回，1文找到相關(guān)的語(yǔ)，如果原文與題目表述的信息一致，答案為TRUE；如果原文與題目表述的息矛」答案為FALSE；如果從原文的信息不能確定題目中所表述的ffi息，答案為NOT GIVEN
Questions 6-13
·題目歸類：Notes Completion
此類題型屬于細(xì)節(jié)題，重點(diǎn)考査定位、提取、歸納信息的能力，解答此類題3人才是先根據(jù)題目中的定位詞，確定答案在原文的范圍，再根據(jù)句意同義替換，提取，歸納　相關(guān)信息，回原文中找到相符的語(yǔ)言重現(xiàn)，從而確定答案。注意在填寫答案時(shí)，都是原文原詞原順序。

希望以上的答復(fù)能對(duì)您的留學(xué)申請(qǐng)有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細(xì)的問題或需要進(jìn)一步的協(xié)助，我強(qiáng)烈推薦您訪問我們的留學(xué)官方網(wǎng)站 ，在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學(xué)考試規(guī)劃和留學(xué)資料以及*的咨詢服務(wù)。祝您留學(xué)申請(qǐng)順利！

2023年2月1日雅思閱讀真題回憶

您好，我是專注留學(xué)考試規(guī)劃和留學(xué)咨詢的小鐘老師。在追尋留學(xué)夢(mèng)想的路上，選擇合適的學(xué)校和專業(yè)，準(zhǔn)備相關(guān)考試，都可能讓人感到迷茫和困擾。作為一名有經(jīng)驗(yàn)的留學(xué)顧問，我在此為您提供全方位的專業(yè)咨詢和指導(dǎo)。歡迎隨時(shí)提問！
閱讀考試一直是不少學(xué)生比較頭疼的部分，那么2月份的雅思閱讀考試真題如何呢？這估計(jì)是不少人士感興趣的話題，和小鐘老師一起來看看2023年2月1日雅思閱讀真題回憶，歡迎閱讀。
2023年2月1日雅思閱讀真題回憶
權(quán)威點(diǎn)評(píng)
這次考試閱讀部分的第1篇文章不論是從主題和題型來看都比較簡(jiǎn)單，是建議盡可能在15分鐘內(nèi)高效完成的類型。第3篇重復(fù)考到了以前的舊題。3篇文章的內(nèi)容，人文社科類的偏多?？傮w而言，這次的閱讀難易程度居中。
Passage 1
題目
英國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)
話題分類
社會(huì)科學(xué)
題型及對(duì)應(yīng)數(shù)量
填空題:7題
判斷題：6題
內(nèi)容回憶
本文講英國(guó)農(nóng)業(yè)問題，農(nóng)作物對(duì)環(huán)境的影響，以及糧食不足的問題。
文章一部分講在非洲進(jìn)口糧食會(huì)更加環(huán)保，節(jié)省歐洲用地和降低對(duì)環(huán)境的影響，但后面又說在歐洲本地種植農(nóng)作物也挺好，不過成本較高。
題目回憶
暫缺
參考閱讀
C12T6P1
Passage 2
題目
古埃及壁畫
話題分類
人文科學(xué)
題型及數(shù)量
人名觀點(diǎn)匹配題、填空題
內(nèi)容回憶
在古埃及壁畫上發(fā)現(xiàn)海運(yùn)，由此列出4個(gè)科學(xué)家對(duì)此的觀點(diǎn)和研究成果。
題目回憶
暫缺
參考閱讀
C7T4P1
Passage 3
題目
Communication in science/科學(xué)界交流
話題分類
人文科學(xué)
題型及數(shù)量
選擇題（5）、判斷題（4）、Summary填空題（5）
內(nèi)容回憶
參考原文：
AScience plays an increasingly significant role in people’s lives, making the faithful communication of scientific developments more important than ever.Yet such communication is fraught with challenges that can easily distort discussions, leading to unnecessary confusion and misunderstandings.

BSome problems stem from the esoteric nature of current research and the associated difficulty of finding sufficiently faithful terminology. Abstraction and complexity are not signs that a given scientific direction is wrong, as some commentators have suggested, but are instead a tribute to the success of human ingenuity in meeting the increasingly complex challenges that nature presents. They can, however, make communication more difficult. But many of the biggest challenges for science reporting arise because in areas of evolving research, scientists themselves often only partly understand the full implications of any particular advance or development. Since that dynamicapplies to most of the scientific developments that directly affect people’s lives global warming, cancer research, diet studies—learning how to overcome it is critical to spurringa more informed scientific debate among the broader public.

CAmbiguous word choices are the source of some misunderstandings. Scientists often employ colloquial terminology, which they then assign a specific meaning that is impossible to fathomwithout proper training.The term “relativity,” for example, is intrinsically misleading. Many interpret the theory to mean that everything is relative and there are no absolutes. Yet although the measurements any observer makes depend on his coordinates and reference frame, the physical phenomena he measures have an invariant description that transcends that observer’s particular coordinates. Einstein’s theory of relativity is really about finding an invariant description of physical
phenomena. True, Einstein agreed with the idea that his theory would have been better named “Invariantentheorie.” But the term “relativity” was already entrenched at the time for him to change.

D“The uncertainty principle” is another frequently abused term. It is sometimesinterpreted as a limitation on observers and their ability to make measurements.

E But it is not about intrinsic limitations on any one particular measurement;it is about the inability to precisely measure particular pairs of quantitiessimultaneously? The first interpretation is perhaps more engaging from aphilosophical or political perspective. It’s just not what the science is about.

FEven the word “theory” can be a problem. Unlike most people, who usethe word to describe a passing conjecture that they often regard as suspect,physicists have very specific ideas in mind when they talk about theories.For physicists, theories entail a definite physical framework embodied in aset of fundamental assumptions about the world that lead to a specific set ofequations and predictions—ones that are borne out by successful predictions.Theories aren’t necessarily shown to be correct or complete immediately.Even Einstein took the better part of a decade to develop the correct versionof his theory of general relativity. But eventually both the ideas and themeasurements settle down and theories are either proven correct, abandoned orabsorbed into other, more encompassing theories.

G“Global warming” is another example of problematic terminology.Climatologists predict more drastic fluctuations in temperatureandrainfall— not necessarily that every place will be warmer. The namesometimes subverts the debate, since it lets people argue that their winter wasworse, so how could there be global warming? Clearly “global climate change”would have been a better name. But not all problems stem solely from poorword choices. Some stem from the intrinsically complex nature of much ofmodern science. Science sometimes transcends this limitation: remarkably,chemists were able to detail the precise chemical processes involved in thedestruction of the ozone layer, making the evidence that chlorofluorocarbongases (Freon, for example) were destroying the ozone layer indisputable.

HA better understanding of the mathematical significance of results and lessinsistence on a simple story would help to clarifymany scientific discussions.For several months, Harvard was tortured months, Harvard was torturedby empty debates over the relative intrinsic scientific abilities of men andwomen. One of the more amusing aspects of the discussion was that thosewho believed in the differences and those who didn’t used the same evidenceabout gender-specific special ability. How could that be? The answer is that thedata shows no substantial effects. Social factors might account for these tinydifferences, which in any case have an unclear connection to scientific ability.Not much of a headline when phrased that way, is it? Each type of sciencehas its own source of complexity and potential for miscommunication. Yetthere are steps we can take to improve public understanding in all cases. Thefirst would be to inculcate greater understanding and acceptance of indirectscientific evidence. The information from an unmanned space mission is noless legitimate than the information from one in which people are on board.

IThis doesn’t mean never questioning an interpretation, but it also doesn’tmean equating indirect evidence with blind belief, as people sometimessuggest. Second, we might need different standards for evaluating science withurgent policy implications than research with purely theoretical value. Whenscientists say they are not certain about their predictions, it doesn’t necessarilymean they’ve found nothing substantial. It would be better if scientists weremore open about the mathematical significance of their results and if thepublic didn’t treat math as quite so scary; statistics and errors, which tell us theuncertainty in a measurement, give us the tools to evaluate new developmentsfairly.

JBut most important, people have to recognize that science can be complex.If we accept only simple stories, the description will necessarily be distorted.When advances are subtle or complicated, scientists should be willing to gothe extra distance to give proper explanations and the public should be morepatient about the truth. Even so, some difficulties are unavoidable. Mostdevelopments reflect work in progress, so the story is complex because no oneyet knows the big picture.
題目回憶

27.why the faithful science communication important?
Answer:
AScience plays an increasingly significant role in people's lives.
28.what is the reason that the anthor believe for the biggest challenges for science reporting?
Answer:
C Scientists do nottotallycomprehend the meaning of certain scientific evolution.
29.according to the 3th paragraph, the reference to the term and example of“theory of relativity ”is to demonstrate
answer:
B common people may be misled by the inaccurate choice of scientific phrase
30.which one is a good example of appropriate word choice
answer:
D Freon's destructive process on environmental
31.what is surprising finding of the harvard debates in the passage?
answer:
B The proof applied by both sides seemed to be of no big difference

32.True
33.Not given
34.Notgiven
35.False
36.wordchoices
37.colloquial terminology
38.observer
39.description
40.general relativity
參考閱讀
C12T8P2
以上是小編整理的2月1日雅思真題，謝謝瀏覽。

希望以上的答復(fù)能對(duì)您的留學(xué)申請(qǐng)有所幫助。如果您有任何更詳細(xì)的問題或需要進(jìn)一步的協(xié)助，我強(qiáng)烈推薦您訪問我們的留學(xué)官方網(wǎng)站 ，在那里您可以找到更多專業(yè)的留學(xué)考試規(guī)劃和留學(xué)資料以及*的咨詢服務(wù)。祝您留學(xué)申請(qǐng)順利！

請(qǐng)問2023年3月2日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案

您好，我是專注留學(xué)考試規(guī)劃和留學(xué)咨詢的小鐘老師。選擇留學(xué)是人生重要的決策之一，而作為您的指導(dǎo)，我非常高興能為您提供最準(zhǔn)確的留學(xué)解答和規(guī)劃。無(wú)論您的問題是關(guān)于考試準(zhǔn)備、專業(yè)選擇、申請(qǐng)流程還是學(xué)校信息，我都在這里為您解答。更多留學(xué)資訊和學(xué)校招生介紹，歡迎隨時(shí)訪問。
3月2號(hào)的雅思考試已經(jīng)順利結(jié)束，真題及答案也全面新鮮出爐，想必大家都是非常關(guān)注的。那么今天就和小鐘老師看一看2023年3月2日雅思閱讀考試真題及答案。
Passage 1
文章題材：說明文（人文社科）
文章題目：Australian Rock Art澳大利亞巖畫藝術(shù)
文章難度：★★

文章內(nèi)容：澳大利亞巖石藝術(shù)的起源；考古學(xué)家研究結(jié)果；目前存在的困難
題型及數(shù)量：5表格填空題+3填空題+5判斷題
題目及答案：
1. ceremonies
2. territory
3. wandjina
4. adornments
5. mouths
6. 1977
7. sketches
8. dress
9. TRUE
10. FALSE
11. NOT GIVEN
12. FALSE
13. TRUE
可參考真題：C10T3P3：Beyond the blue horizon
Passage 2
文章題材：說明文（自然科普）
文章題目：Useful Plants綠色植物吸收室內(nèi)污染物
文章難度：★★★★
文章內(nèi)容：暫缺
題型及數(shù)量：段落匹配5+匹配題3+單句填空題4
題目及答案：
14. 暫缺
15. D
16. G
17. B
18. 暫缺
19. B
20. E
21. D
22. A
23. building materials
24. *all pores
25. ventilation
26. perfect ornamentals
可參考真題：C12T5P1：Cork
Passage 3
文章題材：說明文（商業(yè)科普）
文章題目：Business Research
文章難度：★★★
文章內(nèi)容：目前大部分的商業(yè)研究不具備實(shí)用性；為什么會(huì)跟實(shí)際脫鉤，分析了原因；目前發(fā)生的變化，實(shí)用性差的狀況正在改善。
題型及數(shù)量：?jiǎn)芜x題5+判斷題5+句子配對(duì)題4
題目及答案：
27. D
28. D
29. C
30. A
31. B
32. NO
33. NO
34. YES
35. NOT GIVEN
36. NOT GIVEN
37. B
38. 暫缺
39. D
40. A
可參考真題：C12T8P3：UK companies need more effective boards of directors

以上信息希望能幫助您在留學(xué)申請(qǐng)的道路上少走彎路。如果您還有更多問題或需要深入探討，不要猶豫，您可以在我們的留學(xué)官方網(wǎng)站上找到更豐富的考試資訊、留學(xué)指導(dǎo)和*專家咨詢服務(wù)。我們的團(tuán)隊(duì)始終站在您的角度，為您的留學(xué)夢(mèng)想全力以赴。祝您申請(qǐng)順利！

以上，就是大學(xué)路小編給大家?guī)淼难潘紕?2Passage1：不同尋常的木材 2023年2月1日雅思閱讀真題回憶全部?jī)?nèi)容，希望對(duì)大家有所幫助！